We have already removed hundreds that don’t work since we’ve left the EU, or that the government wanted to change.” The UK would have voted for most of them anyway.
“I wonder if reviewing what I think would be 2,000 laws in 15 months is the right priority during a cost of living crisis, with lots of other things going on. “It does seem to prioritise ideology over pragmatism. “It is a massive undertaking, and you wonder how thoroughly it will be done,” he said. While it remained unclear what would happen at the end of 2023, Peers said, there was a risk the exercise ended as “a bonfire of rights” rather than Truss’s promised bonfire of red tape. Treasury officials have called for EU-based tax laws to be exempt from such plans. Steve Peers, professor of law at the University of Essex and an expert on EU law, said another issue with a guillotine-like end to any remaining laws would be if some covered taxation. The Truss campaign said the Equality Act would not be included in their plans. “Of course, some of it has worked well,” she said, citing the Equality Act as an example. “The more divergence there is, the more trade friction there will be.”īarnard, who is professor of EU law at Cambridge University, said there would be concerns about a plan apparently based on the idea that “any retained EU law is bad”.
“The more divergence there is in practice, the more checks the EU will want to impose,” said Catherine Barnard, deputy director of the UK in a Changing Europe thinktank. “Any serious government needs to demonstrate how it will match resources with commitments, otherwise this is just fantasy politics.”Īnother complication is the fact that diverging from EU standards in areas such as employment or environmental protections could bring retaliation from Brussels, given the terms of the post-Brexit trade deal, not least in terms of extra checks. “If a new prime minister also wants to review thousands of pieces of legislation, then something needs to give,” he said. “Let’s call this out for what it is – ideological posturing at the expense of ordinary working people.”ĭave Penman, head of the FDA union, which represent senior civil servants, said the task had to be seen in the context of plans to get rid of one in five civil service jobs over the next three years. “These are all essential, not a nice-to-have,” said Frances O’Grady, the general secretary of the Trades Union Congress. Sunak has previously said he will appoint a new Brexit minister to go through the remaining EU laws, with instructions for the first set of changes coming within 100 days of him becoming prime minister.Īfter the announcement of Truss’s plans, unions warned of the potential impact on EU-derived workers’ protections.
#Beach head 2000 game cabinet full
Truss said this would mean that as PM she could “unleash the full potential of Britain post-Brexit, and accelerate plans to get EU law off our statute books so we can boost growth and make the most of our newfound freedoms outside the EU”. Any EU laws not replaced would simply disappear at the end of 2023, just 15 months after Truss potentially takes power in September. Her Brexit plan would mean each remaining EU law and regulation would be “evaluated on the basis of whether it supports UK growth or boosts investment”, with those deemed to do so replaced in new UK law. Retrieved October 27, 2012.The foreign secretary is seen as the preferred choice of many Tory members, but Truss has previously faced scepticism from some in the party for her political journey, which she began as a Liberal Democrat before supporting remain in the 2016 Brexit referendum.
0 kommentar(er)
